I would also be curious to the total bill for this military action since the beginning?
http://www.costofwar.com/
Those are the direct costs but many estimate the true amount to be 3-4 times that amount due to future costs for the VA, replacement of national guard/reserve equipment, and other future expenses..
Fixed costs per month=Expense
RENT £600
WAGES £400
ELECTICITY £55
INSURANCE £60
LOAN INTEREST £40
MARKETING £45
Total cost:£1200
Question 1: Explain how each of the following methods below can help mia to manage her cash flow.
REDUCE HER DRAWINGS
HIRE RATHER THAN BUY HER PREMISE
HIRE RATHER THAN BUY ALL HER FURNITURE
EMPLOY AN ASISTANT ONLY DURING THE BUSY MONTHS
NOT TAKE OUT A LOAN
SPEND LESS ON MARKETING
PAY FOR LESS HER PURCHASES ONE MONTH AFTER SHE HAS RECEIVED THEM
ARRANGE AN OVERDRAFT FROM BANK
Question 2
For the months when mia closing balance is negative you must suggest at least two different ways in which mia can manage her cash flow.You must explain the advantages and disadvantages of each method and then make a judgement on what course of action you think is the best to manage mia’s cash flow effectively.
just go on betdaq or betbull , and be a taxfree bookie
thats where the money is , no tax , no electric , no wages , BIG BIG MONEY JUST GETTING THROWN AT YOU ALL DAY EVERY DAY
http://www.betdaq.com/UI/?h=1
http://www.betbull.com/UI/Default.aspx
IM ON 3 GRAND A WEEK FOR SITTIN ON MY ASS AT HOME GETTIN HIGH, LISTENING TO MUSIC
IM JUST A SMALL FISH
THE CLEVER ONES ARE ON 15 GRAND A DAY
As far as you people that believe the war is based on oil and President Bush and friends getting rich off the oil, how can this fiscally happen? Bush and Co are AMERICAN oil producers. To make a profit, they must sell AMERICAN oil, and reduce the incoming foreign oil. So if Bush and Co bring in FOREIGN oil, that lowers the cost per barrel of AMERICAN oil, therefore cutting the AMERICAN oil producers’ profits. Please explain your beliefs that he will profit from this action.
WMDs and Michael Moore?
Iraq’s arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein’s regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.
Israeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam’s WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq’s WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam’s Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.
So rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam’s WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.
Of course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.
Michael Moore, thanks:
Friday, 23 June 2006
When News Lies
WHEN NEWS LIES
Media Complicity and The Iraq War
By Danny Schechter, The News Dissector
A new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."
"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice,"
says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn’t have one without the other."
WHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.
Source(s):
Google it:
Saddam, WMD, Spetsnaz
http://www.wmdthefilm.com/mambo/index.ph…
And the UN vote against the invasion of Iraq was a NO from Germany, Russia, Chian and France. When our troops entered Iraq and captured NEW equipment, where do you think it was bought from??? Germany, France, China and Russia. Conflict of Interest??? A UN Embargo that did not work.
Oh, and who has made the most money from this war??? Michael moore..and he owns stock in Halliburton also.
You are not going to get an answer out of the people who say that. They can’t explain the things they say, they just know how to say it.
On the flip side, one can make the argument that the reason some countries in the U.N. did not vote to invade Iraq was due to oil. Places like France and Russia have/had oil contracts with Iraq, and if they sanctioned an invasion, it would cost them their contracts.
The simple fact is, the simple minded liberals who make the war for oil claims can’t see past the slogans their hero leaders like michael moore spew out of their mouths.
—–
melvin, that is not a documentary. That title was removed because it was proven to be full of half truths, and things taken out of context to reach a particular point. Don’t be so naive.
—-
beren, I suggest you look at this question, and see if the timeline of statements adds up.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhuC2gSDmgjaTBRASaVYtdXsy6IX?qid=20060626222808AAHcTMM
LOS ANGELES (CN) - A federal class action claims that public school students in Los Angeles are denied the basic education guaranteed by the California Constitution as the district plans to lay off thousands of teachers. Due to California’s budget fiasco, the state expects to send out 14,000 reduction-in-force notices to teachers this spring — nearly 5 percent of the teaching force — despite its rank as 46th in the nation in per-pupil spending.
Students at Samuel Gompers, John H. Liechty, and Edwin Markham Middle Schools, in the city’s poorest areas, with the highest concentration of minorities, were hit the hardest, according to the Superior Court complaint. Already "denied the basic educational opportunity guaranteed them by the California Constitution," according the complaint.
Those schools expect to lose or already have lost 50 to 70 percent or more of their teachers.
Schools in wealthier areas face far fewer layoffs.
And the layoffs affect teachers who were prepared and committed to serve the poor, minority, urban students, the class claims. Such schools have a higher percentage of non-English speakers, less access to materials, and more students with learning disabilities than schools in wealthier districts.
The class of students and parents say their schools had "successfully recruited a critical mass of teachers committed to staying at the schools and becoming a foundation for an experienced, effective teaching corps." But that has been demolished, the class claims.
The class adds that because their schools had the highest concentration of young teachers, they were disproportionately affected by the reduction in force, which dismissed teachers with less experience first.
Since layoffs began, the plaintiff students have been taught by a string of substitutes. Some students have had as many as 9 substitutes so far this school year, several of whom do not have credentials in the areas they teach - or no credentials at all, the complaint states.
(Schools traditionally rotate such "permanent substitutes," as they must pay them more per day after a certain period, so disrupting students’ learning saves the state money.)
Many teachers who are assigned to the poor urban schools from the state’s "Rehire List" quit after a few days or weeks because they are unable to keep control of classrooms, or they don’t want to work in the poor areas, the class claims.
"Effective instruction is not merely a matter of whether a teacher is able to teach the course content; it is also a matter of whether the teacher is able to teach that content to the students who attend that school," the complaint states.
In the past 5 years, Gompers Middle School, in Watts in South Central Los Angeles, has had fewer than 15 percent of its students perform at or above proficient levels on state achievement testing, the complaint states. Markham Middle School, also in Watts, had only 13 percent of its students score as proficient.
California expects to send out 14,000 reduction-in-force notices by this spring, said Ramon Cortines, Los Angeles Unified School District Superintendent. California has about 307,000 public schoolteachers.
Receiving a RIF notice does not guarantee that a teacher will be laid off; many schools do not complete the hiring process until late August. But receiving a RIF notice makes teachers fear for their job and seek a new one. They become demoralized, distracted and can’t focus on teaching, which exacerbates an already devastating situation, the class claims.
The class sued California and the Los Angeles Unified School District, alleging violations of equal protection under the Constitution. They seek an injunction, costs and fees.
Their lead attorney is Mark Rosenbaum with the American Civil Liberties Union.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2010/02/25/25047.htm
there are talks—on KFI640am radio—John and Ken 2-7pm…m-f that tend to lean toward chartering a majority of the schools as to bypass having the expense of supportive services like ESL and other expenses…when schools reopen under a business—-they can market and directly accept enrollment from more desired students…….they did this in Huntington Beach—-and it placed illegal children into a more monitorable environment….